The problem with AI anything is it is still extremely unreliable. I had an argument with an AI opponent and it definitely won the argument from my perspective, but the system decided I won for some reason. It felt completely arbitrary and made me not trust the judgement of the app.
I didn't create an account because it's asking for my email address when using my google account. Don't want more spam.
Also, some decisions seem more politically charged than necessary, like using "Donal Trump" as an example of an "Easy" debate opponent.
Finally, I don't know the SMS-style abbreviations are much appreciated on HN (u for you is the most annoying example in your introduction). I'm not sure why it's bothering me enough to tell you about it...
Is there a way to see some past debates? Would give me a flavour of how the site works without having to sign up and wait for someone to come online. Well done on releasing.
It would be far more efficient to have participants prompt LLM agents and have those agents debate one another. Who cares about what humans consider correct or logical in a world where LLMs will do most of the decision making and reality fabrication anyway? It's like asking a cow its opinion on the dairy industry.
Me: "Sites should not require account creation at a late stage of initial engagement. Account requirements should be disclosed up front to avoid wasting peoples' time."
The problem with AI anything is it is still extremely unreliable. I had an argument with an AI opponent and it definitely won the argument from my perspective, but the system decided I won for some reason. It felt completely arbitrary and made me not trust the judgement of the app.
The idea seems very cool.
I didn't create an account because it's asking for my email address when using my google account. Don't want more spam.
Also, some decisions seem more politically charged than necessary, like using "Donal Trump" as an example of an "Easy" debate opponent.
Finally, I don't know the SMS-style abbreviations are much appreciated on HN (u for you is the most annoying example in your introduction). I'm not sure why it's bothering me enough to tell you about it...
Is there a way to see some past debates? Would give me a flavour of how the site works without having to sign up and wait for someone to come online. Well done on releasing.
I really like it. How did you create rooms for playing with friends? Did you use a specific tech or open source library?
I am trying to implement the same for a game I am building but have no idea how to go about doing it.
Thanks in advance
Since there's prolly no active users on it rn, to test it u could try the bot mode or ask a friend to debate with you :)
This is the internet you are creating HN.
It would be far more efficient to have participants prompt LLM agents and have those agents debate one another. Who cares about what humans consider correct or logical in a world where LLMs will do most of the decision making and reality fabrication anyway? It's like asking a cow its opinion on the dairy industry.
Me: "Sites should not require account creation at a late stage of initial engagement. Account requirements should be disclosed up front to avoid wasting peoples' time."
Plato: "Yep, can't argue with that."
Einstein: "Indubitably."
Trump: "Covfefe"