It makes sense that the way dating apps classify people ends up shaping how we think about ourselves. Categories are never neutral. Even something as simple as “serious relationship” versus “casual dating” nudges people into making identity choices rather than just expressing fluid preferences.
A useful way to see this is to think of dating apps less like marketplaces and more like personality trainers. By giving you drop-downs, filters, and tags, they are constantly asking you to rehearse a particular version of yourself. Over time, those rehearsals stick. You start saying “I am this kind of dater” instead of “right now, I feel like this.”
What is novel here is not that technology influences identity, advertising and TV have done that for decades, but that dating apps are interactive feedback systems. Every swipe reinforces not only who you think you want but who you think you are. In that sense, the categories are doing double duty: they constrain your choices and they slowly calibrate your sense of self.
So the interesting question is not whether the categories are “accurate” or “inclusive” but whether we want platforms to keep that much influence over how identities are formed. They are not just matching people. They are training us in how to describe, filter, and rank ourselves in intimate contexts. And that carries a much heavier weight than we usually acknowledge.
Tight feedback loops, and where hookups are the goal then it's a real dopamine cycle. I'm guessing we'll be dealing with the impact of this for decades before we as a society manage to deal with it properly.
It makes sense that the way dating apps classify people ends up shaping how we think about ourselves. Categories are never neutral. Even something as simple as “serious relationship” versus “casual dating” nudges people into making identity choices rather than just expressing fluid preferences.
A useful way to see this is to think of dating apps less like marketplaces and more like personality trainers. By giving you drop-downs, filters, and tags, they are constantly asking you to rehearse a particular version of yourself. Over time, those rehearsals stick. You start saying “I am this kind of dater” instead of “right now, I feel like this.”
What is novel here is not that technology influences identity, advertising and TV have done that for decades, but that dating apps are interactive feedback systems. Every swipe reinforces not only who you think you want but who you think you are. In that sense, the categories are doing double duty: they constrain your choices and they slowly calibrate your sense of self.
So the interesting question is not whether the categories are “accurate” or “inclusive” but whether we want platforms to keep that much influence over how identities are formed. They are not just matching people. They are training us in how to describe, filter, and rank ourselves in intimate contexts. And that carries a much heavier weight than we usually acknowledge.
Tight feedback loops, and where hookups are the goal then it's a real dopamine cycle. I'm guessing we'll be dealing with the impact of this for decades before we as a society manage to deal with it properly.