The argument for 28 MPH e-bikes makes sense - matching traffic speed improves safety by reducing differential speed, which is a major cause of accidents. But if we’re serious about integrating e-bikes into urban mobility, 40 MPH is a more practical threshold. Why? Because most urban and suburban roads are posted at 35 MPH and allowing e-bikes to travel at or slightly above that speed means riders can use the same routes as cars without being a rolling hazard.
At 28 MPH, you’re already in motorcycle territory for kinetic energy and stopping distance, which means proper safety gear should be mandatory. Raising the limit to 40 MPH just makes that reality more obvious and formalizes the need for licensing and training - similar to mopeds or light motorcycles. This approach would create a clear regulatory framework instead of the current gray zone, and it would make e-bikes a true alternative to cars for short urban trips.
The argument for 28 MPH e-bikes makes sense - matching traffic speed improves safety by reducing differential speed, which is a major cause of accidents. But if we’re serious about integrating e-bikes into urban mobility, 40 MPH is a more practical threshold. Why? Because most urban and suburban roads are posted at 35 MPH and allowing e-bikes to travel at or slightly above that speed means riders can use the same routes as cars without being a rolling hazard.
At 28 MPH, you’re already in motorcycle territory for kinetic energy and stopping distance, which means proper safety gear should be mandatory. Raising the limit to 40 MPH just makes that reality more obvious and formalizes the need for licensing and training - similar to mopeds or light motorcycles. This approach would create a clear regulatory framework instead of the current gray zone, and it would make e-bikes a true alternative to cars for short urban trips.