Then you are free to sue whoever you think is violating your copyright. That's one of Serpapi's defenses: the owner of the copyright needs to sue, not a non-exclusive licensee of the copyright (Reddit).
This is a great legal defense, but if they are trying to make themselves seen as though they are fighting for the rights of the users and aren't doing the literal same thing that Reddit is doing, that is disingenious.
Previously, and on the Perplexity side:
Our Response to Reddit, Inc. vs. SerpApi, LLC: Defending the First Amendment
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45739889
So…if Reddit doesn’t own the content, it belongs to the user who posted it, then doesn’t this only harm Serpai’s case further?
I have posted to Reddit and I do not authorize any AI company to use my posts as training data.
Then you are free to sue whoever you think is violating your copyright. That's one of Serpapi's defenses: the owner of the copyright needs to sue, not a non-exclusive licensee of the copyright (Reddit).
This is a great legal defense, but if they are trying to make themselves seen as though they are fighting for the rights of the users and aren't doing the literal same thing that Reddit is doing, that is disingenious.
Reddit isn’t trying to protect user content here. They’re suing to make sure they’re the only ones who can monetize it.
Not sure how you’d reach the conclusion that it would harm SerpApi’s case. They’re the ones being sued.
Is SerpApi asking each user for permission to use their posts if they are saying that the rights of the posts belong to the user?