Show HN: StackScope – I crawled over 40k indie launches to see what they ship

8 comments

• $pixel_popping an hour ago

  Images/layout is broken - tried both chromium/ff. GET https://stackscope.dev/css/fonts.css?v=LZFlL4O9GYH_vtKkLpJwV... NS_ERROR_CORRUPTED_CONTENT

  GET https://stackscope.dev/css/stackscope.css?v=qkmEKPTNqImS7aeD... NS_ERROR_CORRUPTED_CONTENT

  GET https://stackscope.dev/css/utilities.css?v=l7--cPr2cfIn6iDRB... NS_ERROR_CORRUPTED_CONTENT

  GET https://stackscope.dev/css/page-extras.css?v=m-VKj9bQg7fMpFK... NS_ERROR_CORRUPTED_CONTENT

  GET https://stackscope.dev/js/site.js?v=SxUp8zU6gnAArRwBXr22wIBS... NS_ERROR_CORRUPTED_CONTENT

  [-]
  • $datafreak_ an hour ago

    What's your response header content? Reads like it's being cf-mitigated.

    Edit: loosened a cf rule, should be good now.

• $addedlovely 3 hours ago

  Nice one.

  I've been doing the same bit wider scope, for the whole Crux list, pruned to apex domains, and looking for CMS signals - how's your throughput?

  I'm not doing any headless browser stuff, or many requests, so hyper optimised for speed.

  I do grab robots.txt - didn't really see much in llms.txt or humans.txt in the wild, does yours?

  [-]
  • $addedlovely 3 hours ago

    Ohh Cloudflare verified bot status, interesting I'll check that out.

    I'm seeing about 6.6% block rate, but that does climb over time.

• $Gabriel_Valente an hour ago

  Nice one, looks interesting. I didn't knew that Vercel was so far ahead on hosting. People don't usually use Cloudflare Pages for hosting? Or it doesn't enter in that metric? https://stackscope.dev/trends/2026/06

  Overall this looks solid

  [-]
  • $datafreak_ an hour ago

    Cloudflare Pages get hidden behind the CF CDN, so are included in the CDN figure.

    [-]
    • $Gabriel_Valente 25 minutes ago

      right, makes sense

• $idid 3 hours ago

  One extension, beyond stack: market category/domain/application - or any combo that tells me what the product does.

  Fab project otherwise!