It says unauthorized streams... but what does that actually mean? In my country they are broadcast free-to-air. Do you need to pay to watch the games in some countries?
Absolutely. In Canada one of the big media companies had exclusive rights to broadcast the games. They do offer OTA broadcast if you have a digital antenna, although I don't know if everything game was available there. Otherwise it was a $30/month subscription to TSN+ or I believe they had a discount to get access for the e entirety of the world cup for $50-$70 (can't quite remember).
Someone paid for those free-to-air broadcasts. They reclaim the money from advertisement. For example, in Germany, ARD and ZDF paid €152M for the rights to air the 2026 World Cup. To answer your question: any stream from non-ARD/non-ZDF source, or a source not directly sub-licensing the stream from those two, is an unauthorized stream.
You can't just put it up on the internet because it "came free". Putting a German stream for viewers not physically in Germany would be even worse.
To say that it's American money in specific is laughable. The internet hasn't worked well on a matchday for quite some time in Spain due to their draconian laws around blocking piracy.
Not very effective: https://fmhy.net/video#live-sports
I condone piracy (laughs hysterically) thanks for sharing the link.
Yet I can watch the world cup and the tour de france for free in Australia from SBS on TV and streamed online.
So much greediness
Who pays for that then? There must be some reason SBS doesn't allow viewers outside Australia.
Edit: Seems SBS is partially funded by the Australian govt, ie taxpayers.
That's right. Further the SBS was introduced to allow more ethnic broadcasting of content not in English following the war in around 1970.
Not a bad approach
And so can I using the convenient Firefox VPN...
It says unauthorized streams... but what does that actually mean? In my country they are broadcast free-to-air. Do you need to pay to watch the games in some countries?
Absolutely. In Canada one of the big media companies had exclusive rights to broadcast the games. They do offer OTA broadcast if you have a digital antenna, although I don't know if everything game was available there. Otherwise it was a $30/month subscription to TSN+ or I believe they had a discount to get access for the e entirety of the world cup for $50-$70 (can't quite remember).
Someone paid for those free-to-air broadcasts. They reclaim the money from advertisement. For example, in Germany, ARD and ZDF paid €152M for the rights to air the 2026 World Cup. To answer your question: any stream from non-ARD/non-ZDF source, or a source not directly sub-licensing the stream from those two, is an unauthorized stream.
You can't just put it up on the internet because it "came free". Putting a German stream for viewers not physically in Germany would be even worse.
American money has really made football sickening, from advert breaks to half time shows to blatant bribery. Time to retire fifa.
I think FIFA has been doing blatant bribery for much longer than just this World Cup.
In terms of where to host stuff sure.
“Hydration breaks” were bad enough when it was too hot. when it’s 20C drizzle or in an air conditioned stadium it’s just for adverts.
Bribery to get players into the host country, or to get players unsuspended, it’s never been so blatant.
That disgusting half time nonsense hasn’t occurred before.
To say that it's American money in specific is laughable. The internet hasn't worked well on a matchday for quite some time in Spain due to their draconian laws around blocking piracy.