Maybe it’s just me but (and I ask this as something of an ML practitioner myself) can anyone at Anthropic or Open AI or any of the frontier labs work on summarizing content into a format where a human won’t immediately vomit?
There’s this sort of local optima all these models pick which is instantly recognizable and hardly digestible for human consumption. Perhaps too much internal RL against benchmarks during chain of thought? The older non reasoning models had they’re own problems but at this point I can’t get an LLM to summarize data for humans, which is troubling.
As much as I’d like to read this piece it follows suit and I don’t have the patience to try and extract anything valuable from it.
"write (whatever you want written), BUT do not make it sound like a typical AI don't use any of the tropes or typical phrases that AI tends to use - if you include anything that makes it appear to be from AI then the task has failed. Pull your writing away from the median and toward very specific random styles that are NOT the cliched, averaged LLM style."
edit: actually wrong I tried to get ChatGPT to do this and it kept falling back into LLM speak even when it recognised that's what it was doing.
what do you think these things are trained on? mountains of rubbish, human and likely also AI slop. how many bad movies and ads do u think they are fed. poor things. i can see them caged in the corporate HQ, with their tails shoved down their own throats rigged up to the SlopExtractor9000.
its time for the UN to Unslop the world. or something like that :(
Before LLM, the majority of the web was content farms... but those are instantly recognizable and we seldom fall into them. Now LLM mixed the content farm style writing with _some_ real content. It take time and effort to tell they are slop, causing much fatigue.
Your competitor has a $100m self-implosion in what must be an all-time slam dunk marketing moment and you spend 7 cents generating a marketing blog post instead of having someone write it.
As Kevin Bacon put it in Quicksilver,
"What happened to all that money?"
"Nothing happened to it.
The money's still there.
It just belongs to somebody else now."
Since this has become a thread about complaining about unreadable, brain-killing AI slop, I'll add mine:
>Six steps, no jargon. The note beside each one is the precise technical version, for anyone who wants to check the work.
I think this is called "concept leak" or "prompt leak" (please someone correct me, I can't recall at the moment.) It is one of my least-favorite failure modes. I notice it a lot when drafting landing pages, and it eats up a lot of time to edit away.
Maybe it’s just me but (and I ask this as something of an ML practitioner myself) can anyone at Anthropic or Open AI or any of the frontier labs work on summarizing content into a format where a human won’t immediately vomit?
There’s this sort of local optima all these models pick which is instantly recognizable and hardly digestible for human consumption. Perhaps too much internal RL against benchmarks during chain of thought? The older non reasoning models had they’re own problems but at this point I can’t get an LLM to summarize data for humans, which is troubling.
As much as I’d like to read this piece it follows suit and I don’t have the patience to try and extract anything valuable from it.
Yes, you say:
"write (whatever you want written), BUT do not make it sound like a typical AI don't use any of the tropes or typical phrases that AI tends to use - if you include anything that makes it appear to be from AI then the task has failed. Pull your writing away from the median and toward very specific random styles that are NOT the cliched, averaged LLM style."
edit: actually wrong I tried to get ChatGPT to do this and it kept falling back into LLM speak even when it recognised that's what it was doing.
I'm starting to notice that LLMs tend to speak in the form of movie trailers.
Say this in a deep masculine dramatic voice:
Compare that with this Coldcard page: It's trying too hard to replicate a dramatic movie arc with every... single... sentence...You are correct, and that style of writing is called "broetry".
but someday in a galaxy far far away...
what do you think these things are trained on? mountains of rubbish, human and likely also AI slop. how many bad movies and ads do u think they are fed. poor things. i can see them caged in the corporate HQ, with their tails shoved down their own throats rigged up to the SlopExtractor9000.
its time for the UN to Unslop the world. or something like that :(
Maybe it learn it from content farms, not RL.
Before LLM, the majority of the web was content farms... but those are instantly recognizable and we seldom fall into them. Now LLM mixed the content farm style writing with _some_ real content. It take time and effort to tell they are slop, causing much fatigue.
that is just fatigue. you’ve been vibed too hard.
Your competitor has a $100m self-implosion in what must be an all-time slam dunk marketing moment and you spend 7 cents generating a marketing blog post instead of having someone write it.
"This is the part worth sitting with." - written by AI.
It is possible to get the AI to write stuff that does not sound like AI you just have to ask it to properly.
There are so many AI-isms in this. It is frankly astonishing to me that AI detectors are so poor when this is screaming out.
> Six steps, no jargon. The note beside each one is the precise technical version, for anyone who wants to check the work.
It actually makes me uncomfortable reading this garbage now.
You hear it on TV too often political pundits have this exact turn of phrase.
"But here's the part keeping me up at night....."
It's not gone. It was just transferred in payment to someone who understood the rules of the game better.
As Kevin Bacon put it in Quicksilver, "What happened to all that money?" "Nothing happened to it. The money's still there. It just belongs to somebody else now."
So after all that, still gone?
No, someone else has it. It's a zero-sum game.
So the legal owner can’t use it, correct?
So,.. money never "gone" ?
Since this has become a thread about complaining about unreadable, brain-killing AI slop, I'll add mine:
>Six steps, no jargon. The note beside each one is the precise technical version, for anyone who wants to check the work.
I think this is called "concept leak" or "prompt leak" (please someone correct me, I can't recall at the moment.) It is one of my least-favorite failure modes. I notice it a lot when drafting landing pages, and it eats up a lot of time to edit away.
That's a great name for it; I've seen it on AI-generated form pages, where a version of the requirement text is included alongside an input.
Get a human to write it or GTFO
Good info, but em dash slopmaxxing, slop prose and AI design is such a buzzkill.
It’s not A it’s B. Thanks. Slop.
— — — — and —